Do experiences really make you happier than material purchases?

Across more than two decades of research, yes — consistently. Thomas Gilovich's work at Cornell, along with studies by Leaf Van Boven and others, found that people across income levels, age groups, and countries reliably report more lasting satisfaction from experiential purchases (travel, events, learning, adventures) than from material ones. The effect holds in retrospective surveys, real-time happiness tracking, and willingness-to-pay studies.

What is hedonic adaptation and why does it affect material purchases more than experiences?

Hedonic adaptation is the brain's tendency to return to a baseline emotional state after positive events. Material purchases are especially vulnerable because things can be directly compared to other things — you buy a TV, see a nicer TV, now yours feels worse. Experiences can't be compared this way. A trip to Japan doesn't become less good because someone else took a trip to Iceland. They're not fungible, so the adaptation mechanism that erodes satisfaction from possessions doesn't apply in the same way.

Why do we keep buying things if experiences make us happier?

Two reasons. First, the happiness from material purchases is more predictable in the short term — it's easy to imagine how you'll feel owning something. Experiences are less certain, which makes our brains underweight them in decision-making. Second, our culture orients spending and status signaling around objects more than experiences. Both of these biases can be corrected once you're aware of them.

What counts as a valuable experience?

Research suggests it doesn't need to be exotic or expensive. The key qualities are: the experience should create a story you can share, it should involve some element of novelty or challenge, and it should feel genuinely meaningful to you rather than impressive to others. A weekend camping trip with friends can outperform a luxury resort stay on all the metrics that matter for lasting happiness.

How does anticipating an experience add to its happiness value?

The happiness from planned experiences isn't limited to the experience itself. Research shows we get measurable wellbeing boosts during the anticipation phase — sometimes more than during the event. For material purchases, anticipation is usually short-lived (you order it, it arrives, the mood bump is brief). For experiences, the anticipation window can stretch weeks or months, generating sustained positive emotion through looking forward.

Does sharing an experience with others change the happiness it produces?

Yes, substantially. Experiences generate stories, and stories are social currency. Research from Gilovich's lab found that conversations about experiences are rated as significantly more enjoyable — by both speaker and listener — than conversations about purchases. Shared experiences also create bonding in a way shared consumption rarely does. The social compound interest of experiences is real.

Buy Experiences, Not Things: The Research Behind the Advice Nobody Actually Explains

There’s a regret you don’t often see on the lists of things dying people wish they’d done differently. It’s too mundane, maybe. Too consumer-facing. But if you talked to enough people in their sixties and seventies about how they spent their money in their thirties and forties, it surfaces with uncomfortable regularity.

I wish I’d spent less on stuff and more on experiences.

The flat-screen TV that felt essential. The car upgrade. The kitchen renovation. The second laptop. These decisions made sense at the time — they’re tangible, they’re durable, you can point to them. Six months after buying most of them, you’ve stopped noticing they exist.

But the trip to Costa Rica where your luggage got lost, it rained every single day, and you ended up eating the best meal of your life in a tiny restaurant where nobody spoke the same language — that story is still going twenty years later.

Thomas Gilovich spent most of his career at Cornell studying why.

What 25 Years of Research Actually Found

In 2003, Gilovich and his colleague Leaf Van Boven published a paper called “To Do or To Have? That Is the Question.” It asked a surprisingly simple question: when people reflect on how they’ve spent their money, which makes them feel better — things they purchased, or experiences they had?

The answer was consistent across surveys, studies, and demographic groups: experiences win. Not marginally. Substantially, reliably, across different income levels, ages, and countries.

But the interesting part isn’t the headline finding — it’s why. Because “experiences are more memorable” turns out to be only a small fraction of the story.

The Adaptation Problem With Stuff

Here’s the pattern with most things you buy:

First week — you feel good every time you use it. Month two — it’s just a thing you own. Month six — you’ve seen a slightly better version and now yours feels slightly lacking. Year two — you’ve mostly stopped thinking about it altogether.

Psychologists call this hedonic adaptation: the brain’s reliable tendency to return to an emotional baseline regardless of what you’ve acquired or achieved. Without it, we’d never be able to adjust to changing circumstances. But it has a specific and predictable consequence for purchases: almost everything you buy eventually stops making you happy.

The deeper problem is comparison. Material possessions exist in a web of visible alternatives. You buy a car — there are better cars everywhere you look. You upgrade your apartment — someone always has a nicer one. Each comparison quietly erodes what you own.

Experiences are largely immune to this because experiences aren’t directly comparable. Your trip to Portugal doesn’t get worse when a friend takes a trip to Japan. The camping weekend that nearly got rained out doesn’t lose value because someone else had perfect weather. Experiences are distinct events with their own internal meaning — there’s no catalog of “objectively better experiences” that makes yours feel inferior. The comparison mechanism that slowly poisons material satisfaction simply doesn’t apply the same way.

Experiences Become Part of Who You Are

Gilovich’s later research identified something even more significant. Pay attention to the language people use when discussing what they own vs. what they’ve done.

Things: “I have a car. I own a TV. I bought this jacket.”

Experiences: “I’m someone who hiked that trail. I’m the person who spent three weeks in Southeast Asia. I’ve done that.”

Possessions are things you have. Experiences are things you are.

This isn’t just semantic. Experiences get woven into identity in a way objects never do. They become part of your story — the internal narrative that defines who you’ve been and who you’re becoming. Because identity is the story we carry through life, experiences compound into a richer self over time in a way that accumulating objects simply doesn’t.

It also explains a finding that surprises people: we’re better at predicting how happy experiences will make us than how happy purchases will. When you imagine a trip, you’re imagining who you’ll be on the other side of it. When you imagine a purchase, you’re imagining owning an object — which your brain can accurately value (and then accurately discount) based on everything you know about owning things.

There’s a third mechanism in the research that rarely makes it into the popular summary: experiences generate stories, and stories are the primary currency of human connection.

When you come back from a trip, a course, a race, a festival, or even a disastrously misplanned weekend — you have something to share. Not “I bought a thing” but a story. Stories create conversation. Conversation creates connection. Connection, across decades of wellbeing research, is one of the most powerful drivers of lasting happiness.

Material purchases can have the opposite effect. Studies on conspicuous consumption consistently find that buying expensive visible things creates social distance rather than closing it — it triggers comparison and mild resentment more often than it generates conversation.

Gilovich’s team tested this directly. They had participants describe either a recent experiential purchase or a recent material purchase in conversation. The experiential conversations were rated as significantly more enjoyable — by both the person talking and the person listening. The material conversation stalled quickly: “it’s nice, I like it.” The experience conversation had somewhere to go.

Memories Appreciate

The final piece is the counterintuitive one: our memories of experiences tend to improve over time.

Psychologists call this rosy retrospection — the well-documented tendency to rate past experiences more positively than we rated them at the time. The camping trip where everything went wrong becomes “that legendary disaster trip” in the retelling. The vacation with terrible weather becomes the backdrop for the most genuinely funny story you have. The rough first half of a long hike gets edited out and what remains is the summit.

Things depreciate. A $3,000 TV is worth $800 in four years. A $3,000 experience keeps appreciating in value as memory softens the edges and you keep telling the story.

Add the anticipation effect — research shows the looking-forward-to-it phase generates real, measurable wellbeing that often rivals the experience itself — and the happiness math becomes heavily skewed toward experiences. A planned trip gives you joy before it happens, during it, and after it. A planned purchase gives you a brief spike when it arrives and then mostly nothing.

The Practical Objection

The reasonable pushback: “I still need things. I have a house, a car, a phone.”

That’s true, and this isn’t an argument against owning anything. It’s an argument about proportion and intentionality.

Most people spend more cognitive energy deciding what to buy than deciding what to experience. They research products for hours, read reviews, compare specifications, agonize over choices. They apply almost none of this planning energy to experiences — which remain vague, “someday” shaped intentions until they accidentally happen or quietly don’t.

The shift isn’t to stop buying things. It’s to give experiences the same deliberate attention you already give purchases. Write them down specifically. Research them. Make a plan. Put a date to them.

The people who end up with the richest collection of experiences usually don’t earn dramatically more than everyone else. They treat experiences as things worth planning, rather than things that happen if conditions happen to be favorable.

From “Someday” to Specific

This is where a real bucket list — not a vague wishlist, but a document you actually maintain and return to — earns its keep.

A bucket list is fundamentally an experience planning system. It turns vague intentions (“I’ve always wanted to…”) into stated commitments with enough specificity that your brain can start taking them seriously. Research on goal commitment is consistent: written, specific intentions are executed at far higher rates than unwritten or vague ones.

Pairing that list with a Life in Weeks view makes the planning concrete in a different way: not “someday I’ll do this” but “I have a specific number of years, and some experiences need to happen in earlier windows than others.” The physically demanding ones. The ones that depend on specific seasons or life stages. The ones that need saving toward. Seeing the timeline makes the prioritization real.

And sharing your list — with a partner, a close friend, someone who might actually want to do some of it alongside you — adds the social layer at the planning stage rather than just at the experience stage. The research says that anticipated shared experiences generate even more anticipatory happiness than solo ones, because you’re also looking forward to the relationship dimension of it.

A Question Worth Sitting With

The research isn’t prescriptive. It doesn’t say give away your possessions or stop buying things you find beautiful or useful. It says something more specific: that the ratio in most people’s lives is badly skewed, and that consciously adjusting it produces real, lasting improvements in wellbeing.

The question worth asking before any significant purchase: Will I still care about this in five years, or will I have stopped noticing it within a year?

The question worth asking when a year passes without much planned: What am I treating as “someday” that should be “six months from now”?

The answers tend to redirect attention in useful directions. And the research suggests that what you do with that redirected attention — the experiences you plan, do, and carry with you — is what most of your life’s happiness is actually made of.

Buckist is built for exactly this kind of redirected attention. Add the experiences you want to have. Find inspiration for ones you haven’t thought of yet. Use Life in Weeks to see the timeline clearly. Share your list with the people you want to do these things with.

Download on iOS or get it on Android.